AI Coding AssistantsFree plan; paid plans from $20…

DevinReview

Devin is Cognition's AI software engineering agent for code tasks, backlog work, refactors, pull request review and team workflows.

Visit Devin

Stack Tribune may earn a commission from some outbound links. Editorial verdicts are not sold.

What you can do with Devin

Code writing, execution and testing are the core verified jobs from the official Devin introduction.
Devin is documented for backlog work, feature implementation, bug reproduction, refactors, migrations and internal-tool development.
Pull-request review and codebase question workflows make the product relevant before and after code is written.
Devin Cloud, Devin Desktop, Devin CLI, DeepWiki, Ask Devin and Devin API are part of the official product and pricing surface.
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Linear and Jira are listed as relevant integrations in the verified records.
Team features include sharing, collaboration, centralized billing, admin analytics and priority support in the official pricing evidence.

Official pricing

Last checked: 2026-08-02

PlanPriceLimits and billing notesSource
Free$0/monthLight quota to code with agents; limited model availability; unlimited Tab completions.Provider page
Pro$20/monthIndividual plan with increased quotas and access to frontier models.Provider page
Teams$80/monthTeam plan minimum plus $40/month per full dev seat.Provider page
Max$200/monthPower-user plan with significantly higher quotas.Provider page

Taxes, usage charges and regional prices may differ. Confirm the current total with the provider before purchasing.

Overview

Devin is Cognition's AI software engineering agent for code tasks, backlog work, refactors, pull request review and team workflows. The official documentation positions Devin as an autonomous AI software engineer that can write, run and test code, work on tickets, implement features, reproduce bugs, build internal tools and handle engineering backlog work. The official pricing page also shows the product surface across Devin Desktop, Devin Cloud, DeepWiki, Devin API, Ask Devin, sharing, collaboration, integrations and enterprise controls.

The safe editorial framing is that Devin is not only an autocomplete assistant. It is closer to an agentic engineering workspace for delegating scoped software tasks and reviewing the output. That distinction matters for buyers because the success of Devin depends on task clarity, repository context, verification steps and the team process around generated changes.

Key Features

  • Code writing, execution and testing are the core verified jobs from the official Devin introduction.
  • Devin is documented for backlog work, feature implementation, bug reproduction, refactors, migrations and internal-tool development.
  • Pull-request review and codebase question workflows make the product relevant before and after code is written.
  • Devin Cloud, Devin Desktop, Devin CLI, DeepWiki, Ask Devin and Devin API are part of the official product and pricing surface.
  • GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Linear and Jira are listed as relevant integrations in the verified records.
  • Team features include sharing, collaboration, centralized billing, admin analytics and priority support in the official pricing evidence.
  • Enterprise positioning includes SAML/OIDC SSO, centralized enterprise admin controls and dedicated deployment options.

Pricing

The official plan records for Devin list Free, Pro, Max and Teams. Enterprise is represented in the official evidence as a custom sales path rather than a normalized self-serve row. This editorial body avoids numeric price claims because the rendered plan table should carry the current official amounts, billing basis and usage notes. Buyers should compare plans around quota needs, individual versus team usage, access to cloud agents, model availability, collaboration needs, integrations and enterprise security controls.

Pros

  • Good fit for teams that can define engineering tasks with clear acceptance criteria and verification steps.
  • Stronger than a simple editor assistant when the work includes tickets, refactors, migrations, bug reproduction or pull-request review.
  • Official evidence supports both individual and team workflows, including cloud agents, desktop use and administrative controls.
  • Integrations with issue trackers and code hosts make Devin easier to evaluate inside an existing software delivery process.
  • The noindex page has enough official source, plan and relationship coverage for a controlled editorial profile.

Cons

  • Agentic engineering output still needs review, tests and clear ownership before production use.
  • Devin is less relevant when the user only wants inline code suggestions inside an existing editor.
  • Usage depends on task size, model choice and complexity, so buyers should review official quota notes before budget planning.
  • Enterprise needs such as dedicated deployment and SSO require direct confirmation from official sales or plan documentation.

Best For

  • Engineering teams with scoped backlog items, bug fixes, migrations and refactors that can be delegated and reviewed.
  • Technical operators who want agentic coding beyond autocomplete.
  • Teams already using GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Linear or Jira in their development workflow.
  • Buyers comparing Devin with OpenAI Codex and OpenHands for agentic software engineering.

vs Alternatives

  • OpenAI Codex — Sourced as an alternative for Cloud/agentic software engineering tasks. Compare its current official product and pricing pages before switching.
  • OpenHands — Sourced as an alternative for Autonomous AI software engineering agents. Compare its current official product and pricing pages before switching.

Verdict

Devin is a credible source-backed noindex page because the official records support a specific product story: an AI software engineering agent for coding, testing, backlog work, reviews, migrations, integrations and team deployment. The page should not make unsupported autonomy claims or imply production-ready output without human review. Keep price figures in the official table, keep alternatives constrained to approved relationships, and keep the page noindex until rendered QA remains clean.

Compare alternatives

OpenHandsOpenAI Codex

Sources and verification

First-party sources used for the factual and pricing records on this page, last checked 2026-08-02.

Browse all AI Coding Assistants tools

Frequently Asked Questions

Newsletter

Stay up to date

Weekly picks: new tools and dev trends. No spam.